Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598612›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology2026

Pretraining and the lasso.

Erin Craig, Mert Pilanci, Thomas Le Menestrel, Balasubramanian Narasimhan, Manuel A Rivas, Stein-Erik Gullaksen, Roozbeh Dehghannasiri, Julia Salzman, Jonathan Taylor, Robert Tibshirani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Representation Retrieval Learning for Heterogeneous Data Integration.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Erin CraigDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4893-6671
Mert PilanciDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Thomas Le MenestrelInstitute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Balasubramanian NarasimhanDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Manuel A RivasDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1457-9925
Stein-Erik GullaksenDepartment of Medicine, Hematology Section, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Roozbeh DehghannasiriDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7413-3437
Julia SalzmanDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jonathan TaylorDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Robert TibshiraniDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Research and EducationUM1TR004921 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MANISHA DESAI, DEAN W FELSHER · 2024 to 2026
$30.1M
New Statistical Methods for Medical Signals and ImagesR01EB001988 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSTONE, IAIN M · 2003 to 2018
$6.1M
New Statistical Methods for Medical Signals and ImagesR01GM134483 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Iain M Johnstone · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
SOFTWARE FOR LARGE-SCALE INFERENCE OF THE GENETICS OF LIFESTYLE MEASURES, BIOMARKERS, AND COMMON AND RARE DISEASESR01HG010140 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KUNDAJE, ANSHUL, MONTGOMERY, STEPHEN · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004921NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010140NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001988NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-training is a powerful paradigm in machine learning to pass information across models. For example, suppose one has a modest-sized dataset of images of cats and dogs and plans to fit a deep neural network to classify them. With pre-training, we start with a neural network trained on a large corpus of images of not just cats and dogs but hundreds of classes. We fix all network weights except the top layer(s) and fine tune on our dataset. This often results in dramatically better performance than training solely on our dataset. Here, we ask: 'Can pre-training help the lasso?'. We propose a framework where the lasso is fit on a large dataset and then fine-tuned on a smaller dataset. The latter can be a subset of the original, or have a different but related outcome. This framework has a wide variety of applications, including stratified and multi-response models. In the stratified model setting, lasso pre-training first estimates coefficients common to all groups, then estimates group-specific coefficients during fine-tuning. Under appropriate assumptions, support recovery of the common coefficients is superior to the usual lasso trained on individual groups. This separate identification of common and individual coefficients also aids scientific understanding.

Indexed as

lassopretrainingsupervised learningtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID42598612
PMCPMC13472185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.