ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology2026
Pretraining and the lasso.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Representation Retrieval Learning for Heterogeneous Data Integration.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2026Article
- Predicting high perceived stress in late adolescence: development and validation of a prognostic model.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Using pre-training and interaction modeling for ancestry-specific disease prediction using multiomics data from the UK Biobank.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pre-training is a powerful paradigm in machine learning to pass information across models. For example, suppose one has a modest-sized dataset of images of cats and dogs and plans to fit a deep neural network to classify them. With pre-training, we start with a neural network trained on a large corpus of images of not just cats and dogs but hundreds of classes. We fix all network weights except the top layer(s) and fine tune on our dataset. This often results in dramatically better performance than training solely on our dataset. Here, we ask: 'Can pre-training help the lasso?'. We propose a framework where the lasso is fit on a large dataset and then fine-tuned on a smaller dataset. The latter can be a subset of the original, or have a different but related outcome. This framework has a wide variety of applications, including stratified and multi-response models. In the stratified model setting, lasso pre-training first estimates coefficients common to all groups, then estimates group-specific coefficients during fine-tuning. Under appropriate assumptions, support recovery of the common coefficients is superior to the usual lasso trained on individual groups. This separate identification of common and individual coefficients also aids scientific understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.