Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598586›Full record

SynthesisSaudi medical journal2026

Exploring Translational Medical Research Progress in G20 Countries:

Hana A Alhumud, Fars K Alanazi, Edward B DeVol

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Saudi medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hana A AlhumudHead of Research and Innovation Impact Measurement Unit, Saudi National Institute of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Fars K AlanaziChief Executive Officer, Saudi National Institute of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0757-3245
Edward B DeVolDepartment of Research and Innovation Impact Measurement, Saudi National Institute of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Biomedical research is crucial for advancing medical knowledge and improving public health. However, the research process is often disjointed and lacks seamless progression, leading to delays and missed opportunities. To address this, the concept of translational research has emerged, focusing on the smooth transition of research results to the next stage of inquiry. Methods: This study analyzed approximately 40,000 research publications from the Web of Science database to identify research activities associated with translational research. Publications from Group of 20 (G20) countries over the past 5 years were examined to explore patterns of research focus and progress in this field. Results: There is no universal formula for successful translational research across G20 countries. What works in one country may not yield the same results in another, as factors contributing to success vary significantly among nations. Each country's unique history of success and failure influences its translational research outcomes. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of collaboration and global research efforts in improving predictability and outcomes in translational research. By drawing on diverse perspectives and experiences, the potential for success in specific research activities is expected to increase. Overall, the study emphasizes the need for a more connected and coordinated approach to biomedical research to enhance its impact on health improvement.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalBibliometricsHumansBibliometric analysisG20 countriesResearch productivityTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID42598586
PMCPMC13471418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.