ArticleCureus2026
Pneumomediastinum After Third Molar Surgery: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervicofacial emphysema is defined as the pathological presence of air within the fascial spaces of the neck and face. Dental procedures are a recognized but uncommon cause, and only rarely do they involve the mediastinum; such cases are typically related to the use of high-speed air-driven handpieces or air/water (triple) syringes, producing pneumomediastinum. We report a 22-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with sudden-onset dyspnea immediately after the extraction of two right-sided third molars performed with high-speed air-driven rotary instruments. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography confirmed cervical subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum. She was admitted for airway and hemodynamic monitoring; an esophagogram excluded esophageal injury, prophylactic antibiotics were administered, and she recovered uneventfully, being discharged on the third day. At one-week follow-up, the patient reported complete resolution of dyspnea and chest pain, with no residual cervical swelling or crepitus. Although air-driven handpieces and air syringes are safe and essential tools in dental practice, their use during invasive procedures and in anatomically high-risk areas warrants caution, as it may rarely result in this potentially life-threatening complication. Early recognition and a conservative, multidisciplinary approach are key to a favorable outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.