ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Breast cancer after polyacrylamide hydrogel augmentation: A clinicopathological analysis of 5 cases and literature review.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) injection was once widely used for cosmetic breast augmentation in China but was later banned due to severe long-term complications; PAAG deposition can interfere with breast imaging and delay the diagnosis of secondary breast cancer, bringing great clinical challenges. This study retrospectively analyzed 5 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer long after PAAG injection breast augmentation, summarized their clinical data, multimodality imaging manifestations, pathological features and long-term follow-up outcomes, and combined relevant published literature to further characterize this rare patient population. Our results demonstrated that breast cancer arising in PAAG-augmented breasts presents younger onset age, prominent imaging obscuration, high axillary lymph node metastasis rate and poor overall prognosis compared with conventional breast cancer. Routine breast ultrasound is recommended for long-term surveillance of PAAG recipients, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred examination for evaluating suspicious breast masses; standardized follow-up protocols and active pathological biopsy are essential for early diagnosis and timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.