ReviewBrain & spine2026
Syndrome of the trephined: from pathophysiology to cranioplasty - an updated narrative review.
Review in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Syndrome of the Trephined (SoT), also known as sinking skin flap syndrome, is a potentially reversible neurological complication following decompressive craniectomy (DC). It presents with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, including cognitive decline, psychiatric disturbances, and motor impairments. The underlying pathophysiology is multifactorial, involving reduced cerebral perfusion, altered cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, and mechanical deformation of the unprotected brain due to atmospheric pressure. Research question: This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the clinical outcomes of SoT and to evaluate the impact of cranioplasty timing, diagnostic approaches, and emerging therapeutic strategies on patient recovery. Materials and methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted, focusing on studies addressing the pathophysiology, risk factors, neuroimaging findings, and clinical outcomes of SoT. Relevant articles were identified from peer-reviewed sources and analyzed qualitatively. Results: Cranioplasty remains the definitive treatment for SoT, with substantial evidence demonstrating neurological and functional improvement following restoration of cranial integrity. Early surgical intervention is consistently associated with improved recovery outcomes. Advanced neuroimaging modalities, including perfusion computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and functional MRI, have revealed reversible hypoperfusion and disrupted neural networks, supporting the importance of timely diagnosis and intervention. However, variability persists in diagnostic criteria, optimal timing of cranioplasty, and implant selection. Discussion and conclusion: SoT is an underrecognized but treatable condition with implications for neurological functional recovery. While current management is based on clinical observations and case studies, a diagnostic framework can aid in the classification of SoT as definite, probable, or possible cases. Based on the discussion of the timing of cranioplasty after TBI, a risk-based pathway can help to determine which patients with SoT should be prioritized for cranioplasty. Additionally, a minimum dataset for reporting SoT cases will allow for the comparison of outcomes from future studies. In all patients with SoT, early identification and cranioplasty are key factors in optimizing outcomes. Although cisternostomies have been performed in patients with SoT, the low quality of evidence and lack of benefit compared to decompressive craniectomy prevents any recommendations for their use in the prevention of SoT. Finally, through a multidisciplinary approach to the care of patients with SoT, the framework proposed can be tested in future studies to validate these hypotheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.