Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598540›Full record

ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2026

Treatment satisfaction and patient preference for efanesoctocog alfa over previous hemophilia A treatment: Results from the XTEND-1 phase 3 clinical trial.

Emil Spasov, Doris Quon, Katsuyuki Fukutake, Annemieke Willemze, Jennifer Dumont, Helena Palmborg, Nana Kragh, Emilie Gerard, Amanda Wilson, Jérôme Msihid

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04161495 (A Phase 3 Open-Label, Multicenter Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Recombinant Coagulation Factor VIII Fc-von Willebrand Factor-XTEN Fusion Protein), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04161495 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Open-Label, Multicenter Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Recombinant Coagulation Factor VIII Fc-von Willebrand Factor-XTEN Fusion Protein (rFVIIIFc-VWF-XTEN; BIVV001) in Previously Treated Patients ≥12 Years of Age With Severe Hemophilia A

TypeinterventionalSponsorBioverativ, a Sanofi companyRan2019 to 2022Enrolled159ConditionsFactor VIII DeficiencyArmsefanesoctocog alfa (BIVV001)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emil SpasovClinic of Hematology, UMHAT St George and Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Doris QuonOrthopaedic Hemophilia Treatment Center, Luskin Orthopaedic Institute for Children, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Katsuyuki FukutakeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Annemieke WillemzeSanofi, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jennifer DumontSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Helena PalmborgSobi, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nana KraghSobi, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emilie GerardSanofi, Gentilly, France.
Amanda WilsonSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jérôme MsihidSanofi, Gentilly, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatments for Hemophilia A include prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy. With standard and extended half-life therapies, patients still experience bleeds, and administration 2-4 times a week is needed, which affects adherence. Efanesoctocog alfa is a once-weekly FVIII replacement therapy approved to treat and prevent bleeding in patients with hemophilia A for all age groups. Objectives: To analyze patient treatment preferences and satisfaction comparing once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa with pre-study prophylaxis in adults and adolescents with severe hemophilia A in the pivotal Phase 3 XTEND-1 study (NCT04161495). Methods: Exploratory post-hoc patient-reported outcomes were assessed by treatment preference at Week 52 (via a treatment preference survey) and patient satisfaction at baseline and up to Week 52 (via the 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [TSQM-9], covering: global satisfaction, effectiveness and convenience domains). Relationships between treatment satisfaction and preference versus bleeding and region were also explored. Results: Of 130 patients who completed the preference survey, 90.0% preferred efanesoctocog alfa versus their previous prophylaxis regimen. Similar trends were observed by region. The most common reasons were 'less frequent treatment', 'bleeds and bleed-related complications reduction', and 'feel better protected'. Of 115 patients who completed the TSQM-9 at Week 52, there was a statistically significant improvement from baseline in all three domains. By study end, an increase in the proportion of patients selecting the "best response" for all TSQM-9 items was observed. There were no strong correlations with treatment satisfaction improvements at Week 52 and improvement in quality of life or bleeding episodes. Conclusions: Prophylactic efanesoctocog alfa was preferred to prior prophylactic regimens by most patients and improved patient satisfaction at 52 weeks.

Indexed as

Efanesoctocog alfaFactor VIIIHemophilia APatient satisfactionProphylaxisTreatment preference

Identifiers

PMID42598540
PMCPMC13471226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.