Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598500›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Reassessing Reported Propofol Allergy in a Patient Requiring Jet Ventilation: A Case Report.

Autumn Smith, Peni Daly, Maisie Jackson

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Autumn SmithAnesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Peni DalyAnesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Maisie JacksonAnesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 39-year-old man with severe subglottic stenosis required jet ventilation and total intravenous anesthesia for high-risk airway surgery. However, the patient reported a propofol allergy characterized by facial and tongue swelling, raising concern for prior anaphylaxis. Because alternative anesthetic techniques were considered suboptimal, Allergy and Immunology performed skin prick and intradermal testing to propofol, both of which were negative. Following an intraoperative test dose, propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) was administered safely without complication. This case highlights the importance of systematic evaluation of reported anesthetic allergies in facilitating optimal perioperative management in patients undergoing complex surgeries.

Indexed as

jet ventilationperioperative anaphylaxispropofol allergyshared airway surgeryskin prick testing

Identifiers

PMID42598500
PMCPMC13471126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.