ArticleJournal on advances in signal processing2026
Leednet: a lightweight network for event detection in EEG signals.
Article in Journal on advances in signal processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection of diagnostically relevant events within an EEG recording requires making classification decisions about small event windows of a few seconds duration each. For long-duration EEG recordings, this can translate into thousands of decisions leading to a high computational load, which must be reduced for field deployments of EEG triage and decision support systems, especially in resource-constrained healthcare systems. In this work, we explore three avenues for enhancing computational efficiency: (1) purpose-built architectures; (2) length of the decision window/segment; and (3) lightweight preprocessing and feature extraction. For the architecture, we present LEEDNet (Lightweight EEG Event Detection Network), a lightweight convolutional architecture that is purpose-built for prompt classification of short EEG events into three categories (Normal, Slow Waves, or Spike and Sharp Waves). LEEDNet is evaluated on the expert-annotated NMT-Events dataset with subject-wise splits. Compared to four state-of-the-art baselines, LEEDNet delivers the best performance, on three out of four, performance evaluation metrics while being much more deployment friendly (requiring only 0.25 M parameters and 37 MFLOPs per segment, enabling inference in < 5 ms on a standard CPU). For the segment length, ablation results show a length of 2 s to be the best performing, with longer segments degrading due to label dilution and background dominance. We also examine the impact of different feature engineering configurations and whether the increased computational overhead associated with extraction of complex features leads to substantial performance gains. In particular, we examine three input modalities-raw signals, FFT-based spectra, and wavelets-both independently (single-branch) and in a modular, multi-branch fusion model. Our results indicate that the single-branch LEEDNet, based on Raw EEG data, achieves the best overall performance, with 81.2% accuracy and 77.5% macro-F1. No consistent gains were observed after the introduction of modalities based on Fourier and Wavelet features indicating that, for our architecture, a data-driven approach (based on raw EEG waveforms) is better suited compared to a handcrafted feature engineering approach. This is welcomed from a computation overhead perspective since complex feature engineering can be eliminated in favor of raw samples as input features without sacrificing performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.