ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Use of processed nerve allograft to relieve pain and restore function in individuals with painful upper limb neuroma-a case series of five individuals.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A traumatic nerve injury that is improperly treated or left untreated may result in a painful neuroma with compromised sensory and motor function. Affected individuals might be hesitant to donate a healthy nerve for an autologous nerve graft procedure. The use of processed nerve allografts (PNA) to reconstruct nerve injuries with painful neuromas is less often discussed. We aim to offer perspectives on treating painful neuromas with PNA when autograft reconstruction is considered not an option. Methods: This series involves five individuals with neuroma formation and varying pain and functional impairment after injuries to different upper limb nerves, i.e., two median nerves at the elbow level, two digital nerves (thumb and little finger), and an isolated ulnar motor branch. Surgery was indicated for pain, not essentially for functional improvement. Treatment decisions were based on patients' symptoms and disability, injury location and nature, time since injury, and previous surgeries. No other options were considered other than neuroma reconstruction with PNA (length of PNA 25-70 mm). Various clinical and electrophysiological methods were used to evaluate outcomes. Results: Four out of five individuals experienced improvement after surgery in pain at rest and during activity, but they still had pain during percussion (Tinel's test). Some sensory and motor functions improved, as assessed by clinical and electrophysiological observations. One individual reported ongoing problems, mainly pain and sleep difficulties, and was subsequently referred to a pain clinic. Discussion: Using PNA for reconstruction may be a suitable solution to relieve pain and improve some function in individuals with painful upper limb neuromas, when autologous nerve grafting is not an option, and even when conducted a long time after the initial nerve injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.