Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598421›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Matrix-Aware LC-MS/MS Quantification of Cyhexatin in Chemically Complex Herbal Matrices Using DOE-Assisted Extraction Optimization.

Jun Yeop Kim, Seung Min Lee, Woo Jae Lee, Yu Rim Ha, Jumi Lee, O Ju Lee, Hyung Min Kim, Hyunwoo Kim, Dong-Kyu Lee, Sang Beom Han and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jun Yeop KimCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam 31116, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3764-8094
Seung Min LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam 31116, South Korea.
Woo Jae LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam 31116, South Korea.
Yu Rim HaCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam 31116, South Korea.
Jumi LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, South Korea.
O Ju LeeCollege of Pharmacy and Integrated Research Institute for Drug Development, Dongguk University-Seoul, Goyang, Gyeonggi 10326, South Korea.
Hyung Min KimCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7488-0539
Hyunwoo KimCollege of Pharmacy and Integrated Research Institute for Drug Development, Dongguk University-Seoul, Goyang, Gyeonggi 10326, South Korea.
Dong-Kyu LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2355-8560
Sang Beom HanCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, South Korea.
Troy D WoodDepartment of Chemistry, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2556-8511
Yong Seok ChoiCollege of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam 31116, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6740-3160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matrix-dependent analytical interference remains a persistent challenge in LC-MS/MS quantification of hydrophobic pesticides in chemically complex herbal matrices. Cyhexatin, a highly hydrophobic organotin compound, exemplifies this challenge by exhibiting pronounced response variability across matrices under empirically optimized conditions. To address this limitation, we developed a matrix-aware LC-MS/MS workflow combining design-of-experiments (DOE)-assisted extraction optimization with matrix-matched calibration and surrogate internal standard (IS) normalization. Fractional factorial design was first applied to identify influential extraction parameters, followed by Box-Behnken design (BBD) to establish optimal extraction conditions in a representative challenging matrix, Angelicae Gigantis Radix. The optimized method demonstrated robust quantitative performance across Angelicae Gigantis Radix and Paeoniae Radix, satisfying Codex-aligned validation criteria for selectivity, linearity, accuracy, and precision. The method provided low-ppb analytical sensitivity, with limits of detection of approximately 3-4 ppb and a lower limit of quantification of 10 ppb. Notably, DOE-guided optimization improved cyhexatin recovery in the most challenging matrix from approximately 38% under empirical conditions to within the Codex acceptance range (70-120%). Matrix-matched calibration combined with surrogate IS normalization further reduced matrix-dependent signal variability and improved the stability of quantitative responses across matrices. The combined workflow provided robust quantitative performance in the two investigated herbal matrices and illustrated a design-oriented strategy for improving quantitative reliability under matrix-affected LC-MS/MS conditions.

Identifiers

PMID42598421
PMCPMC13470808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.