ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
MLHeatmap: an interactive application for transcriptomic marker-panel discovery.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Transcriptomic biomarker studies often require separate tools for normalization, classification, feature ranking, and visualization. MLHeatmap was developed to integrate these steps into a cross-platform, browser-based workflow and to support compact marker-panel discovery directly from count matrices. Results: MLHeatmap accepts a count matrix and sample-group labels and performs gene mapping, normalization, multiclass classification with nested cross-validation, feature attribution, differential expression analysis, and interactive heatmap visualization, with support for multiple classifiers and panel-selection methods in the same workflow. As a case study, we applied MLHeatmap to colorectal cancer consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classification using 511 primary tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with published Colorectal Cancer Subtyping Consortium (CRCSC) labels. Random Forest with forward selection achieved 89.8% out-of-fold accuracy and a macro-averaged area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (macro AUC) of 0.973, yielding a 13-gene compact panel with a held-out AUC of 0.960. External validation of the compact panel gave 74.8% accuracy and a macro AUC of 0.917 in GSE39582, an independent Affymetrix GPL570 microarray cohort evaluated in 500 tumors with confident CMScaller-derived CMS assignments, and 69.18% accuracy and a macro AUC of 0.909 in CMCBSN, an independent Korean RNA-seq cohort with 159 confidently labeled tumors. Across the five classifiers and four panel-selection methods evaluated, compact-panel AUCs ranged from 0.895 to 0.970, with tree-ensemble classifiers reaching the highest values. Availability and implementation: MLHeatmap is freely available at https://github.com/kangk1204/MLHeatmap and can be installed and run locally on Windows 11, macOS, and Ubuntu.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.