Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598316›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Case Study in Education: Improving Resident Didactic Training: A Longitudinal Analysis of a Flipped Classroom Curriculum on Normalized Foot and Ankle OITE Scores.

Rohan Charles, Lindsey E Turner, Channon E Cordes Cole, Jonathan D Barlow, Daniel Ryssman, Alexander Vlasak, Norman S Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rohan CharlesOrthopedic Surgery Department, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9025-1036
Lindsey E TurnerOrthopedic Surgery Department, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2839-901X
Channon E Cordes ColeOrthopedic Surgery Department, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.
Jonathan D BarlowOrthopedic Surgery Department, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2481-8064
Daniel RyssmanOrthopedic Surgery Department, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.
Alexander VlasakOrthopedic Surgery Department, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6170-9895
Norman S TurnerOrthopedic Surgery Department, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-9307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Flipped classroom models, which use active, case-based discussion, have shown promise across graduate medical education. Previous literature demonstrates that transitioning to a flipped classroom model resulted in significant increases in overall Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) scores. This observational study retrospectively compares foot and ankle OITE scores for orthopaedic surgery residents before and after implementation of a flipped classroom curriculum. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed OITE scores for orthopaedic residents, comparing a lecture-based curriculum (n = 49) to a flipped classroom curriculum (n = 61). Residents who started their second year in July 2020 or later were defined as treated. The curriculum is given to the postgraduate year-2 (PGY2) residents only. Percentage of correct foot and ankle questions (F&A) were analyzed via mixed-effects models using random-subject intercepts. Fixed effects included PGY, overall performance on other sections, and flipped classroom status. All statistical analyses were performed in R version 4.4.1. Results: Residents in the flipped classroom cohort demonstrated a statistically significant increase in F&A questions answered correctly. The average increase was 7% (95% confidence interval: 4%, 10%; p < 0.001). This improvement trend became clearly visible in PGY3 and grew stronger in senior residents. Specifically, PGY3 residents improved their mean percentage correct from 62.26% to 66.07% (p = 0.16). PGY4 residents improved from 69.16% to 74.83% (p = 0.013), and PGY5 residents improved from 69.03% to 75.53% (p = 0.006). Historically, approximately 75% of traditional PGY5 residents scored lower on the F&A section than on the rest of the examination. Conversely, in the flipped classroom group, approximately 75% of PGY4 and PGY5 residents scored higher on the F&A section compared with other sections. Discussion: The implementation of a flipped classroom model was associated with a statistically significant improvement in resident performance on the F&A section of the OITE. The educational benefits of this curriculum appear cumulative over the course of residency, with the most substantial performance gains realized by senior residents in their fourth and fifth years of training. Level of Evidence: Level III, Observational Study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID42598316
PMCPMC13472659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.