ArticleCureus2026
Educational Impact of a Pre-clinical Anesthesiology Elective.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anesthesiology is often underrepresented in pre-clinical curricula, leaving many students without structured exposure before clinical rotations. This study evaluated an eight-week pre-clinical anesthesiology elective at Baylor College of Medicine, in which first-year medical students voluntarily attended weekly lectures from anesthesiology faculty across four affiliated hospitals covering anesthetic history, modern anesthetic delivery, regional and obstetric anesthesia, and ethics. Anonymous pre- and post-course surveys (13 items, 1-10 scale) assessed specialty interest and self-reported understanding; only the 12 students completing both surveys were included in the analysis, performed via paired t-tests. Self-reported understanding improved significantly across all knowledge domains, including history of anesthesia, early anesthetic techniques, ether/nitrous oxide use, wartime anesthesia, modern techniques and pharmaceuticals, regional/local anesthesia, obstetric anesthesia, and ethical issues (all p < 0.05, most p < 0.001), with the largest gains observed in comfort discussing anesthesiology content and clinically relevant techniques. Interest in anesthesiology, surgical specialties, and non-surgical specialties did not change significantly, likely reflecting high baseline interest among self-selected, voluntary participants. These preliminary findings suggest that even brief pre-clinical exposure to anesthesiology may improve self-perceived understanding and confidence independent of shifts in specialty interest. Given the small sample and reliance on self-reported outcomes, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.