Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598232›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

An Interactive, Case-Based Microbiology Laboratory Session for First-Year Medical Students.

Gabriella Smith, Eric Karney, Julia Hankins, Rachael Liesman, Mimi Precit, Robert Hamilton-Seth, Jessica R Newman, Erica L MacKenzie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriella SmithInfectious Diseases, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Eric KarneyInfectious Diseases, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Julia HankinsPathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Rachael LiesmanPathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Mimi PrecitPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Providence Health & Services, Portland, USA.
Robert Hamilton-SethPathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Jessica R NewmanInfectious Diseases, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Erica L MacKenzieInfectious Diseases, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.

Funding

Kansas Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM138077 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI TIMOTHY A FIELDS · 2020 to 2026
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM138077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Although in-person anatomy sessions continue to be a fundamental component of the medical school curriculum, laboratory-based microbiology sessions are increasingly replaced with virtual equivalents or removed altogether. At the University of Kansas School of Medicine, first-year medical students are introduced to medical microbiology primarily through classroom-based methods (e.g., lectures, flipped classes, and case-based collaborative learning). Methods An optional, extracurricular, "wet" laboratory session was developed as a collaboration between the clinical microbiology lab and the Infectious Diseases Student Interest Group to reinforce and build upon abstract microbiology concepts previously only covered in a classroom setting. Students worked in small groups to solve short case studies involving bacterial and fungal pathogens. Cases required students to recall clinical presentations of common infections, interpret Gram stains, perform basic biochemical tests, and make a presumptive diagnosis. Post-session surveys were used to gauge student reactions and satisfaction with the session. Results This session has been successfully held for five consecutive years and has been well received by students. In post-session evaluations, participants strongly agreed that the session enhanced their understanding of clinical microbiology concepts and valued the hands-on learning opportunity to work with facilitators through case-based discussions. Conclusions We demonstrated the feasibility and value of a hands-on microbiology laboratory session to complement traditional medical school coursework. Future opportunities include pre- and post-session assessments to better assess students' knowledge acquisition and retention following laboratory-based sessions.

Indexed as

infectious diseaselaboratorymedical studentsmicrobiologywet lab

Identifiers

PMID42598232
PMCPMC13471905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.