ArticleCureus2026
An Interactive, Case-Based Microbiology Laboratory Session for First-Year Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction Although in-person anatomy sessions continue to be a fundamental component of the medical school curriculum, laboratory-based microbiology sessions are increasingly replaced with virtual equivalents or removed altogether. At the University of Kansas School of Medicine, first-year medical students are introduced to medical microbiology primarily through classroom-based methods (e.g., lectures, flipped classes, and case-based collaborative learning). Methods An optional, extracurricular, "wet" laboratory session was developed as a collaboration between the clinical microbiology lab and the Infectious Diseases Student Interest Group to reinforce and build upon abstract microbiology concepts previously only covered in a classroom setting. Students worked in small groups to solve short case studies involving bacterial and fungal pathogens. Cases required students to recall clinical presentations of common infections, interpret Gram stains, perform basic biochemical tests, and make a presumptive diagnosis. Post-session surveys were used to gauge student reactions and satisfaction with the session. Results This session has been successfully held for five consecutive years and has been well received by students. In post-session evaluations, participants strongly agreed that the session enhanced their understanding of clinical microbiology concepts and valued the hands-on learning opportunity to work with facilitators through case-based discussions. Conclusions We demonstrated the feasibility and value of a hands-on microbiology laboratory session to complement traditional medical school coursework. Future opportunities include pre- and post-session assessments to better assess students' knowledge acquisition and retention following laboratory-based sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.