ArticleCureus2026
OpenSpineConsortium: An Open-Source Framework for Medical Student Engagement in Computational Spine Imaging Research.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionResearch experience is heavily weighted in competitive specialties, yet preclinical schedules constrain student bandwidth. Prior work shows students acquire coding skills quickly and that imaging-based curricula engage them in scholarship, but programs are institution-bound and rarely couple anatomical learning with authentic computational contribution. This initiative combines open-source spine imaging datasets, Python coding, and a consortium model targeting a clinically high-impact anatomic region.
methodsOpenSpineConsortium (OSC) is a distributed, open-source collaborative unifying public imaging collections into documented, openly licensed datasets, supporting anatomy-aware machine learning for the spine and pelvis. For medical students, this translated into analyzing spine CTs, annotating anatomical structures, and learning to automatically extract clinically useful parameters. Onboarding covers spine anatomy, segmentation, Python, and reproducible workflows. Students completed scoped sub-projects with senior-trainee mentorship. A post-participation survey assessed self-reported skill gains, scholarly output, and specialty interest.
resultsA total of 10 sub-projects span 16 contributors. Self-reported comfort (five-point scale) improved significantly across all six domains (Wilcoxon, all p<0.05), with the largest gains in CT spine interpretation (1.8-3.3, p<0.001), anatomic landmark/pathology identification (2.0-3.2, p<0.001), and Python coding (1.3-2.6, p<0.001). Conference submission, abstract writing, and literature reading also improved significantly. Eight of 16 reported increased interest in neurosurgery and 11 of 16 in research-oriented careers. All 16 would recommend OSC.
conclusionsOSC produced significant gains in spine anatomy, computational proficiency, and scientific communication alongside 10 scholarly projects, supporting a scalable, low-cost model bridging anatomical education, computational training, and authentic contribution within medical school's time constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.