ArticleSaudi medical journal2026
Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Most Cited Publications from Saudi Arabia Reveals the Predominance of Medical Fields.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the citation impact, journals, international collaborations, trends of research topics and gain more visibility for the Saudi contribution to the global scientific landscape. Methods: This bibliometric study analyzes the top 100 cited publications affiliated with Saudi Arabia in Scopus, from inception to January 2026. The extracted bibliometric indicators include total citation metrics, sources, collaboration maps, and co-occurrence networks of keywords and collaborations. Results: The results indicate a strong predominance for medicine and health sciences as the subjects of the most prolific and significant number of citations. A substantial proportion of the most cited papers originates from major global health projects, in particular the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) consortium, which focuses on mortality, morbidity, and epidemiological metrics. Clinical and public health fields are highly represented, including obesity and cardiovascular risk, disease burden, and population health metrics. The most frequent journals include the leading medical journals in the field, namely The Lancet, Nature, Science and the New England Journal of Medicine. Keyword analysis confirms the dominance of medical themes; the most prominent keywords included epidemiology, risk factors, and global health indicators. Within the biomedical predominance, bioinformatics tools such as MEGA software contribute to the citation impact. Conclusions: Saudi Arabia's citation impact is predominantly driven by international consortia participation and bioinformatics tool development, highlighting the opportunities for strengthening independent and nationally led research programs of global significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.