ArticleIranian journal of parasitology
Frequency of
Article in Iranian journal of parasitology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We investigated the prevalence of Methods: Samples of diaphragm and heart tissue were collected from 40 sheep, 40 goats, and 40 camels at local slaughterhouses. DNA was extracted from the samples and analyzed using nested PCR targeting the Results: The results indicate an overall prevalence of 60% (24/40) in sheep, with 37.5% (15/40) of diaphragm samples and 22.5% (9/40) of heart samples testing positive. In goats, the overall prevalence was 52.5% (21/40), with 35% (14/40) of diaphragm and 17.5% (7/40) of heart samples positive. Camels showed the highest prevalence at 65% (26/40), with 45% (18/40) of diaphragm and 20% (8/40) of heart samples infected. Diaphragm tissue showed higher infection rates compared to the heart in all species. No significant difference was found in infection rates between male and female animals. RFLP analysis using XhoI on selected positive PCR products differentiated genotypes based on digestion patterns. Among analyzed samples (19 per species), genotypes II/III were identified in 57.9% (11/19) of sheep, 36.8% (7/19) of goats, and 47.4% (9/19) of camels, with the remainder likely genotype I or undigested II/III. Conclusion: The high prevalence rates observed, especially in diaphragm tissue and in camels, have important implications for public health and food safety. Enhanced meat inspection, public education, and further research on effective control measures are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.