ReviewPathogens & immunity2026
Keystone Epitope Theory: Implications for Hypersensitivity, Autoimmunity, and Transplantation.
Review in Pathogens & immunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-evolved Partners of Immunity: A Trait-Based Map of Human Keystone Organisms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Keystone Epitope Theory: An Ecological Perspective on RNA Viruses, Tumor Immunoediting, and Vaccine Design.Pathogens & immunity · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HLA class I alleles confer a striking risk for T cell-mediated drug hypersensitivity, yet positive predictive values are low-typically under 10% and as low as 0.12% for some drug-HLA pairs. We propose that persistent, human-adapted pathogens-notably herpesviruses-focus postnatal immune memory on conserved epitopes in the tissue niches where viral control occurs (the Keystone Epitope Theory). The phylogenetic basis for this proposal is that herpesviruses and their vertebrate hosts have co-adapted over hundreds of millions of years, and that this co-evolutionary relationship is replayed ontogenetically as each individual acquires these infections and builds tissue-specific immune memory. When a drug-altered self-peptide approximates the geometry of such a target and is presented by the same risk HLA in the same niche at sufficient density, pre-existing tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM) may be recruited, breaching local regulatory equilibria and driving immunopathology. We synthesize three strands of evidence: (i) heterologous immunity, in which virus-imprinted TRM cross-recognize drug-modified self; (ii) antigen presentation in the same tissue where antiviral memory already resides, which helps explain why injury is tissue-restricted; and (iii) public and private TCR solutions that bridge viral and self-targets. Beginning with T cell-mediated drug hypersensitivity as an empirical anchor, we extend this framework to EBV-associated multiple sclerosis and transplant rejection and conclude with proposed experimental validation strategies that may be applicable more broadly to T cell-mediated hypersensitivity and autoimmunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.