ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Innominate artery reimplantation as a strategic step in lifetime aortic management: a vascular surgeon's perspective.
Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of complex aortic disease has evolved toward a "lifetime management" strategy, where the initial surgical arch repair critically influences the feasibility of future staged interventions. While the left subclavian artery has received significant attention, the strategic role of the innominate artery (IA) as a primary endovascular gateway remains underappreciated. This paper explores how IA reimplantation geometry determines the success of subsequent endovascular procedures. We analyzed the technical requirements for optimal antegrade endovascular access during complex downstream repairs, such as branched and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (B-FEVAR). Two surgical strategies aimed at optimizing supra-aortic vessel alignment were evaluated: the "arch vessels' switch" technique using a standard trifurcated graft, and the use of the novel T-NEXT hybrid prosthesis (Terumo Aortic, Vascutek Ltd., Renfrewshire, UK). In currently available frozen elephant trunk (FET) and hybrid arch grafts, the longitudinal arrangement of supra-aortic branches often results in sequential vessel reimplantation patterns that may create acute angulations between the IA and the ascending aorta. Such configurations can impair guidewire and catheter maneuverability, reducing effective transmission of torque and forward force during antegrade navigation toward the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta. The "arch vessels' switch" technique, in which the IA is reimplanted onto the distal (3
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.