ArticleCureus2026
Comparison of Outcomes in Early- and Late-Tracheostomised Head Injury Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly tracheostomy (ET) has been associated with improved airway stability and reduced complications in mechanically ventilated patients. Its optimal timing in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains debated, particularly because outcomes may be influenced by baseline neurological severity, associated injuries, and clinical selection for tracheostomy timing.
objectiveThe study aimed to compare unadjusted clinical outcomes between ET (<4 days) and late tracheostomy (LT) (>4 days) in patients with severe head injury and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score <8.
methodsThis retrospective comparative study included 120 patients with severe TBI managed over 18 months. Patients were classified into ET (n=60) and LT (n=60) groups based on the timing of the procedure. Outcomes analysed included duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, time to ward transfer, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and final clinical outcome. The analysis was unadjusted, and multivariable regression was not performed because complete covariate data for injury severity, associated injuries, sedation exposure, respiratory status, and weaning-related factors were not uniformly available in the retrospective records. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
resultsMean age was 43.08 years in the ET group and 39.27 years in the LT group. In the unadjusted analysis, mean DMV was significantly shorter in the ET group (8.45 ± 4.09 days) compared with the LT group (13.73 ± 4.47 days; p<0.05). ICU stay was significantly shorter in the ET group (11.93 ± 5.24 days) than in the LT group (19.00 ± 7.02 days; p<0.05). VAP incidence was numerically lower in the ET group, with five patients (8.3%), than in the LT group, with 12 patients (20.0%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Clinical improvement was significantly higher in the ET group, with 49 patients (81.7%), compared with the LT group, with 27 patients (45.0%). The ET group had higher day 1 and day 3 GCS values than the LT group, indicating baseline neurological imbalance between groups.
conclusionIn this retrospective, unadjusted cohort, ET in patients with severe TBI was associated with shorter duration of MV, reduced ICU stay, earlier ward transfer, and better short-term clinical outcomes compared with LT. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because the groups were not fully comparable in neurological severity, no prospective sample size calculation was performed, and multivariable adjustment for confounding was not possible. The results represent associations rather than evidence that ET independently caused improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.