Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597977›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026

How oral cancer is taught: a scoping review.

Lalima Tiwari, Omar Kujan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lalima TiwariOral and Maxillofacial Biology & Diseases Research Stream, UWA Dental School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Omar KujanOral and Maxillofacial Biology & Diseases Research Stream, UWA Dental School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This scoping review aims to examine the current modes of delivery of oral cancer education amongst health care practitioners and students. It also seeks to identify challenges in teaching and gaps within existing educational approaches. Methods: Studies examining the mode of delivery of oral cancer education among any health care practitioners, university students, or training programs were included in the literature search across bibliographic databases. Results: Thirty-nine studies were found to be eligible for inclusion. A variety of modes of oral cancer education delivery were identified, including oral presentations, hands-on training in head and neck examination, case-based discussions and problem-based learning approaches, clinical observation, biopsy performance, and a range of structured educational models. All teaching methods demonstrated improvements in oral cancer knowledge compared with baseline, to varying degrees. The time allocated to oral cancer education ranged from 0 to 50 h, with a median duration of 2 h. Conclusions: Consensus on the most effective mode of delivery is lacking; however, findings across all studies indicate that any form of oral cancer education intervention is preferable to none. Furthermore, there is an urgent need to increase the amount of time devoted to oral cancer education across health curricula.

Indexed as

dental educationeducationoral canceroral cancer educationoral potentially malignant disorders

Identifiers

PMID42597977
PMCPMC13470247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.