ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026
How oral cancer is taught: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This scoping review aims to examine the current modes of delivery of oral cancer education amongst health care practitioners and students. It also seeks to identify challenges in teaching and gaps within existing educational approaches. Methods: Studies examining the mode of delivery of oral cancer education among any health care practitioners, university students, or training programs were included in the literature search across bibliographic databases. Results: Thirty-nine studies were found to be eligible for inclusion. A variety of modes of oral cancer education delivery were identified, including oral presentations, hands-on training in head and neck examination, case-based discussions and problem-based learning approaches, clinical observation, biopsy performance, and a range of structured educational models. All teaching methods demonstrated improvements in oral cancer knowledge compared with baseline, to varying degrees. The time allocated to oral cancer education ranged from 0 to 50 h, with a median duration of 2 h. Conclusions: Consensus on the most effective mode of delivery is lacking; however, findings across all studies indicate that any form of oral cancer education intervention is preferable to none. Furthermore, there is an urgent need to increase the amount of time devoted to oral cancer education across health curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.