ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2026
Rapidly Progressive Intracranial Arterial Stenosis in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Case Report with Longitudinal Imaging and Implications for Endovascular Management.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The natural history of intracranial arterial stenosis caused by giant cell arteritis (GCA) and the effects of therapeutic interventions remain unclear. We report a case of rapidly progressive intracranial arterial stenosis associated with GCA and discuss its clinical course and the implications for endovascular management. Case Presentation: A 75-year-old man developed multiple intracranial arterial stenoses and occlusions over several months, resulting in cerebral infarction. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed for severe stenosis of the cavernous segment of the right internal carotid artery, which exhibited delayed distal contrast opacification. Temporal artery biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of GCA. Although inflammatory markers improved with optimal medical treatment, the untreated intracranial arterial stenoses progressed rapidly, leading to extensive cerebral infarction. In contrast, no restenosis was observed at the site treated with angioplasty during the 6-month follow-up period. Conclusion: Rapidly progressive intracranial involvement in GCA may lead to a devastating clinical course, with progression of arterial stenosis occurring despite apparent control of systemic inflammation. This case highlights that intracranial arterial stenosis due to GCA can progress rapidly even under immunosuppressive therapy, underscoring the importance of serial vascular imaging and suggesting that some patients may benefit from early consideration of endovascular treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.