Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597933›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases2026

Comparative effectiveness of UV-LED light and CO

Bunlue Kornmatitsuk, Yuki Fujisawa, Thanyaporn Homat, Sirichai Eardmusic, Ladawan Sariya, Sudsaijai Kornmatitsuk

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bunlue KornmatitsukDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Yuki FujisawaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Thanyaporn HomatLivestock and Wildlife Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Lum Sum, Sai Yok, Kanchanaburi, 71150, Thailand.
Sirichai EardmusicFaculty of Animal Sciences and Agricultural Technology, Silpakorn University, Phetchaburi Campus, Cha-am, Phetchaburi, 76120, Thailand.
Ladawan SariyaMonitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Sudsaijai KornmatitsukDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to (i) compare the effectiveness of three attractants (UV-LED light, CO

Indexed as

3D-printed suction trapBluetongue virusCO2CulicoidesUV-LED lightVector surveillance

Identifiers

PMID42597933
PMCPMC13469804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.