ArticleACS omega2026
Wind-Aware Methane Sensor Architecture at a Gas Plant: CFD Analysis of Tree- and Infrastructure-Controlled Plume Pathways.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methane emissions from oil and gas facilities are increasingly monitored using fixed-point sensor networks and continuous monitoring systems, but the effectiveness of these systems depends strongly on sensor location. At the facility scale, plume transport is distorted by buildings, tanks, pipe racks, and surrounding vegetation, so locations that are informative under one wind regime can become ineffective or biased under another. In this study, steady Reynolds-averaged computational fluid dynamics was used to simulate methane dispersion from representative tank and flare-stack release scenarios at a gas plant in west-central Alberta while resolving the combined effects of plant infrastructure and tree canopies. The model domain was 320 m × 320 m × 120 m, and 27 mean-wind cases were examined across three wind directions, three wind speeds (3.6, 9, and 18 km/h), and three ambient temperatures (-15, 5, and 25 °C). The simulations show that wind direction and wind speed are the dominant controls on monitoring design. Temperature enters the present model primarily through density, thereby providing a density-sensitivity check rather than a full atmospheric-stability analysis. Low winds produced broad, wake-sensitive, near-ground plumes, whereas high winds produced 50-70% narrower advective corridors and, in some cases, lifted plume segments above portions of the canopy. Rotation of the wind from south-southwest to south or northeast shifted the informative monitoring sector from one side of the plant to another. The results identify five monitoring rolessource-proximal, dominant-sector downwind, sheltered-wake/canopy-edge, elevated, and background sensorsrather than a single universal layout. The simulations further show that sheltered zones within the plant can locally elevate methane concentrations in the range of 0.5-2 ppm by reducing dilution, potentially biasing release-rate inference if these locations are used without an advective plume and background reference. Overall, the study supports a wind-aware, role-based sensor architecture for gas plants surrounded by vegetation-dense areas.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.