ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Data fairness-the new social challenge of the data economy: what shapes social media users' perception of data fairness?
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Data fairness has become an increasingly important issue in the digital economy. Although social media platforms extensively collect and utilize personal data, limited research has examined how users perceive data fairness and the factors shaping such perceptions. Methods: Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Privacy Calculus Theory, a research model was developed incorporating algorithmic awareness, algorithmic attitude, data transparency, perceived control, privacy self-efficacy, and privacy concerns. Survey data from 589 WeChat users were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Results: The results showed that algorithmic awareness positively influenced algorithmic attitude, which subsequently enhanced perceived data fairness. Data collection transparency and data processing transparency positively affected perceived control, whereas data use transparency had no significant effect. Perceived control and privacy self-efficacy positively influenced perceived data fairness. Privacy self-efficacy also reduced privacy concerns, which negatively affected perceived data fairness. Conclusion: This study advances the emerging literature on data fairness by identifying the key factors shaping users' perceptions of data fairness in social media. The findings provide new insights into the psychological mechanisms underlying fairness perceptions and offer practical implications for developing more transparent and user-centered data governance practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.