Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597899›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Data fairness-the new social challenge of the data economy: what shapes social media users' perception of data fairness?

Chaoguang Huo, Fanfan Huo, Dongxiang Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chaoguang HuoSchool of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Fanfan HuoInstitute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Haidian, China.
Dongxiang ZhaoSchool of Information Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Data fairness has become an increasingly important issue in the digital economy. Although social media platforms extensively collect and utilize personal data, limited research has examined how users perceive data fairness and the factors shaping such perceptions. Methods: Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Privacy Calculus Theory, a research model was developed incorporating algorithmic awareness, algorithmic attitude, data transparency, perceived control, privacy self-efficacy, and privacy concerns. Survey data from 589 WeChat users were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Results: The results showed that algorithmic awareness positively influenced algorithmic attitude, which subsequently enhanced perceived data fairness. Data collection transparency and data processing transparency positively affected perceived control, whereas data use transparency had no significant effect. Perceived control and privacy self-efficacy positively influenced perceived data fairness. Privacy self-efficacy also reduced privacy concerns, which negatively affected perceived data fairness. Conclusion: This study advances the emerging literature on data fairness by identifying the key factors shaping users' perceptions of data fairness in social media. The findings provide new insights into the psychological mechanisms underlying fairness perceptions and offer practical implications for developing more transparent and user-centered data governance practices.

Indexed as

algorithm awarenessdata fairnessdata privacydata transparencyperceived data fairnesssocial media

Identifiers

PMID42597899
PMCPMC13469658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.