ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Subcuticular Sutures Outperform Staples in Early Wound Healing After Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wound complications remain a major concern after total hip arthroplasty (THA), as they delay mobilization, prolong hospitalization, and increase infection risk. Evidence on wound closure for the minimally invasive anterolateral approach is limited. Therefore, this study compared skin stapling and subcuticular suture closure regarding early wound healing and scar quality after minimally invasive anterolateral THA. Methods: A total of 583 consecutive patients undergoing short-stem THA via minimally invasive anterolateral approach were retrospectively analyzed. All procedures used identical implants, perioperative protocols, and wound management. Procedures differed only in skin closure, using either staples or absorbable subcuticular sutures. Primary outcome was early wound condition, defined by secretion, erythema, and time until the wound was considered unremarkable. Secondary outcomes included revision for wound complications, early implant revision, length of hospital stay, and scar quality. Results: Use of subcuticular sutures resulted in a significantly shorter duration of erythema ( Conclusions: Subcuticular suture closure was associated with improved early wound healing and earlier hospital discharge after minimally invasive anterolateral THA. These findings suggest a potential advantage which should be further evaluated in prospective randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.