ArticleDigital health
The impact of smart healthcare and eldercare on older adults' health and health inequality: Evidence from China.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Digital health now serves as a central paradigm for modern health promotion, sparking growing concerns over whether it exacerbates health inequalities. Anchored in China's "Smart Healthcare and Eldercare" policy (SHE), this study investigates the policy's impact on older adults' health outcomes and inequality, offering empirical insights into this critical debate. Methods: Based on 32,634 micro-samples from five waves (2014-2023) of the China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey (CLASS), this study employs a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) approach to identify the causal effects of the SHE pilot policy. Health is characterized by self-rated, mental, and functional health, with corresponding health inequality indices calculated based on the relative deprivation index. Results: The results show that SHE significantly improves self-rated health and mental health, with no significant effect on functional ability. The results provide evidence for three mechanisms: healthier behaviors, increased health-related expenditures, and enhanced utilization of community medical and other services. SHE also narrows inequalities in self-rated and mental health, but widens gaps in functional ability. Further analyses show that while the policy improves access to health resources in a broadly universal manner, disparities in older adults' digital usage capacity hinder the equal translation of technological interventions into functional ability gains. As a result, improvements in functional ability are more concentrated among socioeconomically advantaged groups, leading to widened inequality. Conclusion: This study confirms that digital health interventions effectively improve older adults' health. However, to prevent widening health inequalities, targeted measures like digital literacy training must be implemented for digitally vulnerable groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.