ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2026
Machine learning-driven identification of key chemical determinants of tobacco leaf sensory irritation.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To identify the key chemical components affecting the sensory irritation of tobacco leaves, a binary classification model for high and low irritation was constructed based on 78 chemical components and sensory evaluation scores of 353 tobacco leaf samples. Methods: First, the median absolute deviation (MAD) method was applied to remove outliers from the high- and low-irritation samples. Then, the ReliefF algorithm was applied for dimensionality reduction, selecting 33 core features to eliminate data redundancy. Using the selected features, a random forest (RF) algorithm was employed to build the classification model, and the optimal number of decision trees was determined to be 60. Results: The ReliefF-RF model achieved an accuracy of 84.38% on an independent test set, with precision, recall, and F1-score all at 86.49%, outperforming the original RF model as well as other machine learning models such as support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN). Through feature importance evaluation, eight key chemical indicators were identified: total nitrogen, total alkaloids, cryptochlorogenic acid, oleic acid + linolenic acid, reducing sugar, sugar-nitrogen ratio, Fru-Asp, and neochlorogenic acid. Discussion: SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that higher levels of nitrogenous compounds were strongly associated with increased irritation, whereas elevated levels of sugar components, specific organic acids, and amino acid derivatives were associated with reduced irritation. Notably, Fru-Asp exhibited a complex non-linear response, where both extremely high and low levels contributed to higher irritation. This study provides a useful reference and data support for the targeted regulation of cigarette irritation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.