ArticleACS omega2026
Impact Angle-Velocity Interactions Governing Solid-Particle Erosion in Laser Powder Bed Fused AlSi10Mg.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the erosive wear behavior of laser powder bed fused (LPBF) AlSi10Mg alloy samples subjected to different heat treatments, including T5 (direct aging), T6, SR (stress relieving), and as-built (AB) conditions. The erosion study was carried out under different impact angles (30, 60, and 90°) and different impact velocities (30, 70, and 90 m/s). The erosive wear is severe at 30° impact angle, indicating that the ductile mode is prominent. The wear rate increases for all materials as the impact velocity increases from 30 to 90 m/s. The T5 heat-treated sample consistently exhibits the lowest erosive wear rate. In contrast, the T6 heat-treated and as-built (AB) samples display higher susceptibility to erosion, influenced by their properties. SEM analysis highlights distinct surface features across the samples; T5 samples show deep grooves and material smearing, indicating effective absorption of impact energy at 90° impact angle, while T6 and AB samples exhibit evidence of brittle fracturing, such as fragmented particles and debris. The critical findings from the study highlight that microstructural stability is also a key factor in erosion behavior alongside hardness, emphasizing the importance of heat treatment in optimizing wear resistance for high-impact applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.