Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597763›Full record

ArticleCognitive therapy and research2026

Adding Meaning and Context to Nodes and Edges: A Mixed Methods Approach to Enhance the Validity of Idiographic Networks.

Melissa Miléna De Smet, Lune Imaani Quintens, Dries Debeer, Joran Jongerling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive therapy and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa Miléna De SmetTilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Lune Imaani QuintensGhent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dries DebeerGhent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Joran JongerlingTilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Experience Sampling Methods (ESM) are increasingly used to derive idiographic networks, which promise more personalized interventions. Using the most frequently used network approach (VAR-model), we demonstrate the value of qualitative methods to enhance their validity. Methods: A multiple case study with four adolescents examined the relationship between identity/self-esteem and depressive complaints. Quantitative ESM data was enriched with open-ended ESM data and semi-structured interviews. In a mixed methods parallel design, VAR-based networks and reflexive thematic analyses were combined. Results: The qualitative data gave meaning and context to adolescents' ESM data and networks, revealed uncaptured experiences and challenged associations in the network. Conclusion: Mixed methods approaches can enhance the validity of idiographic networks by personalizing ESM designs prior to assessment, adding meaning and context to nodes and edges, and providing alternative explanations for observed dynamics. We discuss several reasons, strategies and ways forward for mixed methods idiographic networks. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10608-025-10670-6.

Indexed as

Experience sampling methods (ESM)Idiographic networksMixed methodsPersonalized careReflexive thematic analysisValidity

Identifiers

PMID42597763
PMCPMC13469479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.