ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
A case of central migration of a prosthetic femoral head following bipolar hemiarthroplasty treated with conversion to total hip arthroplasty using an acetabular reinforcement ring.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Central migration of the prosthetic femoral head occurs in approximately 7% of cases following bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) for femoral neck fractures. If treated promptly, it can be managed by cup placement; however, if left unaddressed, a large acetabular bone defect can develop. Herein, we report a case of central migration with a severe bone defect after BHA, successfully treated with conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a Burch-Schneider cage. Case Report: An 86-year-old man underwent BHA at a local hospital for a right femoral neck fracture in Year X-8. He experienced right hip pain in Year X-4. An X-ray examination in Year X-3 revealed mild central migration of the prosthesis. However, follow-up was discontinued afterward. In Year X, he visited the hospital with complaints of worsening right hip and abdominal pain. He was subsequently referred to our hospital for further examination and treatment. Based on clinical images, he was diagnosed with central migration of the prosthetic femoral head with a Type 3B acetabular defect in the Paprosky classification. A conversion THA with a reinforcement ring was planned. The surgery was performed using a supine anterolateral approach. A Burch-Schneider cage was placed to bridge the gap, and the defect was filled with bone cement. He commenced full weight bearing the day after surgery without experiencing any pain. He achieved independent ambulation with a cane 8 days after surgery and was discharged home. One year postoperatively, he had a favorable post-operative course without any complications. Conclusion: Central migration of the prosthesis inevitably occurs at a certain rate after surgery. In cases involving extensive bone defects, rigid acetabular reconstruction with implants is essential. However, the procedure is technically challenging and could pose a significant surgical burden to patients. Periodic imaging evaluations and timely interventions are essential for patients with BHA to avoid this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.