ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Toward precision neuroscience in Alzheimer's disease: the role of multimodal AI.
Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasingly understood as a biologically defined and heterogeneous continuum, requiring models that move beyond symptom-based diagnosis toward individualized risk prediction, stratification, and intervention. Objective: This mini-review outlines how precision neuroscience frameworks may support the characterization of AD by integrating multimodal biomarkers, systems biology, systems neurophysiology, digital health markers, and artificial intelligence (AI). Methods: We synthesize recent developments across multi-omics profiling, neuroimaging and electrophysiological biomarkers, AI-based speech analysis, and multimodal machine learning approaches, with emphasis on their potential contribution to biologically informed disease staging and personalized clinical decision-making. Results: Omics and systems biology approaches are expanding the characterization of molecular pathways involved in AD susceptibility, progression, and treatment response. Systems neurophysiology, including multimodal neuroimaging, electrophysiology, and whole-brain modeling, provides complementary markers of large-scale network disruption across the AD continuum. Digital health technologies, particularly AI-based speech analysis, offer scalable and ecologically valid tools for early risk enrichment and longitudinal monitoring. Multimodal AI models further enable the integration of heterogeneous clinical, molecular, imaging, genetic, and behavioral data into probabilistic representations of disease burden and progression. However, clinical translation remains constrained by interpretability, harmonization, validation, fairness, and accessibility challenges. Conclusion: Precision neuroscience offers a promising framework for reconceptualizing AD as a dynamically modeled and biologically stratified disorder. Future progress will depend on robust multimodal datasets, transparent AI methods, longitudinal validation, and equitable implementation strategies capable of supporting early detection, trial enrichment, and personalized prevention or treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.