Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597741›Full record

ReviewDEN open2027

Third Space Endoscopic Therapies for Benign Motility Disorders: A Narrative Review.

Sanjana Bhagwat, Amol Bapaye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DEN open, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanjana BhagwatShivanand Desai Center for Digestive Disorders Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center Pune India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4961-8640
Amol BapayeShivanand Desai Center for Digestive Disorders Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center Pune India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7632-814X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To review the evidence base, evolution, outcomes, adverse events (AEs), and management for third-space endoscopy (TSE) procedures for management of benign motility disorders. Methods: This review examines TSE procedures for motility disorders, reviewing the current available techniques, success, outcomes, and long-term outcomes from the literature. Results: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia cardia is now established as first-line therapy, endorsed by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American College of Gastroenterology, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, and international expert bodies, with long-term clinical success exceeding 90% at 7 years. Since 2010, the technique has evolved considerably, with refinements in myotomy length, orientation, and depth, along with intraoperative use of an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe to optimize outcomes and reduce post-procedure gastroesophageal reflux (GER). The TSE platform has since expanded to spastic esophageal disorders, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, Zenker's and epiphrenic diverticula (Z-POEM/D-POEM), refractory gastroparesis (gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy), and Hirschsprung's disease. Techniques have also been modified along the way to achieve better results while minimizing AEs. Post-POEM GER, occurring objectively in 40%-55% of patients, remains the principal long-term challenge, and multiple modalities have been explored to address it. Conclusions: TSE has fundamentally transformed the management of benign gastrointestinal motility disorders, with POEM serving as the paradigm for the shift from surgical to endoscopic treatment. Ongoing technical refinement, GER mitigation strategies, and emerging innovations are poised to further advance the field. Trial Registration: N/A.

Indexed as

G‐POEMperoral endoscopic myotomyPOEMthird‐space endoscopyZ‐POEM

Identifiers

PMID42597741
PMCPMC13469352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.