Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597720›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging2026

The impact of resistance training on the cognitive health of older adults: a narrative review.

Marie Pullerits, Ivi Vaher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marie PulleritsPhysiotherapy and Environmental Health Department, Tartu Applied Health Sciences University, Tartu, Estonia.
Ivi VaherPhysiotherapy and Environmental Health Department, Tartu Applied Health Sciences University, Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Population aging is associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline, highlighting the need for effective and accessible interventions to support cognitive health in older adults. Resistance training has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological strategy; however, the role of training intensity in optimizing cognitive outcomes remains unclear. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes 28 peer-reviewed publications, representing 24 independent study samples, published between 2014 and 2024 that examined the effects of resistance training intensity on cognitive function and related physiological markers in older adults. Results: Evidence indicates that low-, moderate-, and high-intensity resistance training can improve cognitive performance and markers of overall brain and physiological health, including neurotrophic factors, inflammation, and cerebral blood flow. Reported benefits include improvements in executive function, memory, processing speed, and spatial abilities. Moderate-intensity resistance training (approximately 60%-79% of one-repetition maximum) showed the most consistent benefits across studies, though direct intensity comparisons remain limited. Conclusions: Resistance training, particularly at moderate intensity, appears to be a feasible and effective strategy for supporting cognitive health in older adults, although further research is needed to determine optimal training prescriptions and long-term effects.

Indexed as

ageingcognitive functionalitycognitive health of older adultselderly trainingexecutive brain functionsolder adultsresistance training

Identifiers

PMID42597720
PMCPMC13469083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.