Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597719›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2026

Hawthorne Effect in Screening Ambulatory Activity Status Using Wearable Pedometers Varies Across Age Groups.

Saleh Hammad, Abdelhafez Alnawayseh, Rami Hammad, Laurent Ballaz, Haidar Djemai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saleh HammadDepartment of Physical and Health Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Abdelhafez AlnawaysehDepartment of Sport Rehabilitation, Faculty of Sport Science, Mutah University, Mutah, Jordan.
Rami HammadDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Laurent BallazDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Haidar DjemaiInstitute for Research in BioMedicine and Epidemiology of Sport (IRMES), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Using wearable step-counting devices is a common method in scientific research to evaluate ambulatory activity. The Methods: A convenience sample of 60 men was included and allocated into 3 age groups (20-25, 40-45, and 60-65 years), with 10 participants in the control group and 10 in the experimental group for each age category. Step count data were collected in 2 stages: first, from the previous week, month, and 6 months; second, after 7 days of wearing a digital sham pedometer watch. Participants in the experimental groups were told that the watch is a step-counting device and that their activity was being monitored, even though all data were collected from the iPhone "Health" application (iOS 16.5), while the control group remained blinded until the last data collection was completed. Results: Comparison of pre- and postintervention data showed positive Hawthorne effect on the level of ambulatory activity in young, middle-aged, and older adults by 62.90%, 55.58%, and 81.96%, respectively. Significant differences were found between each experimental group and its respective control group after the 1-week intervention ( Conclusions: The research concludes that all experimental groups increased their step count by more than 50% compared with baseline levels.

Indexed as

behavioral changehealthphysical assessmentSedentary lifestyletechnology

Identifiers

PMID42597719
PMCPMC13470273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.