ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2026
A task-aligned multimodal machine learning framework for studying working memory dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is one of the most functionally debilitating non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Yet, current diagnostic and clinical practices rely heavily on subjective assessments and burdensome behavioral testing, which lack the temporal resolution to detect subtle deficits. While EEG and pupillometry offer promising non-invasive insights into cognitive processing, more scalable and objective methods are needed to detect subtle and often elusive dysfunction in early PD. Machine learning (ML) leverages patterns in neurophysiological signals recorded during cognitive tasks to identify subtle impairments that may not be evident in standard evaluations. We recorded EEG and pupillometry data from 68 participants (35 PD, 33 healthy controls (HC)) during a visual Change Detection working memory task. Using our custom, standardized feature-extraction toolbox, we extracted 108 features and incorporated the resulting feature matrices into an ML pipeline. We applied SMOTE to balance the classes, then used principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce dimensionality. An automated elbow method identified optimal cutoffs for principal components (PCs) and original features, which guided subsequent recursive elimination (RE) for computational efficiency. We trained a support vector machine with a radial basis function kernel (SVM-RBF) to classify PD and evaluated the final model's performance on a hold-out dataset. The automated elbow method identified optimal cutoffs at 20 PCs and 22 original features. The RE revealed that a model using 14 PCs and the top 7 PCA-weighted features achieved the highest performance, with 71% accuracy and an F1 score of 0.701. The classifier's performance declined slightly when tested on held-out data, with an accuracy of 63% and an F1 score of 0.626. This study demonstrates the potential of a task-aligned ML pipeline for uncovering early cognitive markers of PD. The framework supports post-hoc feature contribution mapping, linking retained physiological features and task stages back to classification-relevant patterns, supporting mechanistic investigation of cognitive dysfunction in PD. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-026-10526-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.