ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Uncertainty displays in pandemic dashboards: a review of COVID-19 use cases.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pandemic dashboards are a key resource that public health professionals and the public use to access timely, dynamic, and multivariate public health data. Epidemiological data inherently carry uncertainty due to factors related to location, time, and the movement of people and the spread of disease. Uncertainty information has been neglected in dashboard design due to some technical challenges, including the complexity of communication, and to avoid potential misinterpretation. However, including uncertainty information may improve transparency and dashboard actionability in public health. This study scanned Canadian COVID-19 dashboards to assess how uncertainty was communicated during the pandemic. A total of 69 dashboards were analyzed in 2023. The findings show that most COVID-19 dashboards did not meet best practices for improving actionability and usability, nor did they include uncertainty data. Only 1 of 69 dashboards included a visualization of uncertainty, highlighting a substantial gap between established uncertainty visualization research and real-world public health dashboard design. Additionally, most dashboards lacked a clear target user and did not provide sufficient resources to support public use. Future research can investigate how dashboard users engage in public health decision-making and change their health behaviours using uncertainty information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.