ReviewFrontiers in physiology2026
Effects of different frequencies of ankle pump exercise on lower limb hemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantifiable ankle pump exercise monitoring for early postoperative rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ankle pump exercise (APE) is commonly used to improve lower-limb circulation, but the hemodynamic effects of different frequencies remain unclear. This study evaluated frequency-specific hemodynamic changes after APE to inform practical exercise protocols. Methods: As of March 2026, six databases-PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP-were systematically searched according to PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies involving 546 participants, including healthy individuals and patients with postoperative immobilization, fractures, hemiplegia, or restricted mobility, were included, of which only one was an RCT. The effects of APE at different frequencies on mean femoral venous blood flow velocity were analyzed using a paired change-score approach. Analyses were conducted at the specific-frequency level to reduce unit-of-analysis error from repeated frequency comparisons and shared baseline measurements. Sensitivity analyses were performed, and methodological quality was assessed using the NHLBI quality assessment tools according to study design. Results: Studies were grouped according to APE frequency, and frequency-specific within-arm analyses showed that mean femoral venous blood flow velocity generally increased from baseline across all evaluated frequencies. Smaller increases were observed at lower frequencies, particularly at 3 cycles/min, whereas more pronounced within-arm increases were generally observed at 10 cycles/min or higher, including at 10 cycles/min (MD = 15.16 cm/s, 95% CI: 11.87 to 18.46). However, this observation was based mainly on indirect comparisons of changes from baseline across studies rather than direct head-to-head comparisons between different frequencies. No consistent pattern indicated that progressively higher frequencies necessarily resulted in additional benefits. Sensitivity analyses using fixed-effect models and leave-one-out procedures showed that the direction and statistical significance of the findings were generally stable. Conclusions: APE may improve lower-limb venous hemodynamics by increasing mean femoral venous blood flow velocity. Frequencies of 10 cycles/min or higher tended to show larger within-arm increases than lower-frequency protocols, but this observation was based mainly on indirect cross-study comparisons rather than direct head-to-head comparisons and should be interpreted cautiously. Given the predominance of non-randomized or quasi-experimental studies and the very low certainty of evidence, the optimal exercise frequency remains uncertain, and further well-designed studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.