ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Augmentation Plating with Intramedullary Nailing for Aseptic Long Bone Non-union: A Prospective Observational Study of Clinical, Radiological, and Functional Outcomes.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Non-union of long bone fractures after intramedullary nailing (IMN) remains a demanding clinical challenge. Augmentation plating - applying a supplementary plate over the retained nail - offers superior rotational control without the morbidity of nail extraction. This prospective study evaluated clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of this technique for aseptic femoral and tibial non-unions. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with aseptic diaphyseal non-union of the femur or tibia underwent augmentation plating with selective autologous bone grafting (April 2024-September 2025). Radiological healing was assessed by the modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (mRUST). Functional recovery was quantified by the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) and Wu's criteria. Results: All 30 patients (17 femoral, 13 tibial) achieved radiological union, representing a 100% union rate. Mean time to union was 6.23 ± 0.82 months (range 5-8 months). Femoral non-unions healed significantly faster than tibial non-unions (5.88 vs. 6.69 months; P = 0.005). The mean mRUST score improved from 5.17 ± 0.79 preoperatively to 15.33 ± 0.84 at final follow-up (P < 0.001). Mean LEFS improved from 31.77 ± 3.39 to 76.60 ± 3.77 (P < 0.001). By Wu's criteria, 60% achieved excellent and 30% achieved good results; no patient had a poor outcome. The complication rate was 10%, comprising two superficial infections managed conservatively and one deep infection managed with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention; fracture union was achieved in all three. Conclusion: Augmentation plating with selective autologous bone grafting delivers 100% union rates with predictable healing timelines and near-normal functional recovery in aseptic femoral and tibial non-unions. The technique is mechanically sound, biologically preserving, and operatively efficient - making it a reliable first-choice revision strategy in this clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.