ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2026
Recurrent aqueous misdirection following intraluminal ripcord removal from a Paul Glaucoma Implant.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report a case of aqueous misdirection occurring shortly after intraluminal ripcord removal in a pseudophakic, previously vitrectomized eye implanted with a PAUL Glaucoma Implant. Case description: A 65-year-old Caucasian woman presented with primary angle-closure glaucoma and previous history of aqueous misdirection following a combined procedure of phacoemulsification and XEN45 gel stent implant, which was managed with pars plana vitrectomy elsewhere. Because of high IOP despite maximum tolerated medical treatment, a PAUL Glaucoma Implant was performed with positioning of a 6-0 Prolene® intraluminal ripcord. Shortly after ripcord removal 6 weeks postoperatively, she presented with significant myopic shift, uniformly shallow anterior chamber, and markedly raised IOP. Anterior-segment OCT showed patent tube in the superotemporal quadrant of the anterior chamber, suggesting the recurrence of aqueous misdirection. Revision of pars plana vitrectomy with extensive peripheral vitreous shaving and irido-zonulo-hyaloidectomy was required to restore anterior chamber depth, to re-establish forward aqueous flow, and to stabilize IOP. Conclusions and importance: This case suggests that intraluminal ripcord removal from a PAUL glaucoma implant can elicit aqueous misdirection in eyes at risk. Furthermore, the final outcomes of the present case suggest that thorough pars plana vitrectomy with irido-zonulo-hyaloidectomy may be the most effective surgical approach to aqueous misdirection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.