ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2026
Cost-Effectiveness of Fetal Fibronectin Testing in Women at Risk for Preterm Birth: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Does "Success" Mean in the Cost-Effectiveness of Fetal Fibronectin Testing? [Response to Letter].ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- What Does "Success" Mean in the Cost-Effectiveness of Fetal Fibronectin Testing? [Letter].ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The fetal fibronectin (fFN) test is used to predict true preterm delivery. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fFN testing versus no-fFN testing in identifying true preterm labor among women with preterm labor symptoms at risk for premature birth. Methods: This retrospective cohort-based study was conducted among women who presented with symptoms of preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation at a tertiary care hospital in Qatar and compared outcomes between those who received fetal fibronectin (fFN) testing and those who did not. A decision-tree model compared fFN testing to no testing, with the primary outcome being the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, representing the additional cost for a successful delivery within 48 hours of admission. Clinical data were collected from HMC medical records, and direct medical costs was locally obtained, reflecting the Qatari hospital perspective. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the study results. Results: A total of 519 women were analyzed. Significant baseline differences were observed between groups. The proportion of delivery within 48 hours was higher in the fFN group (94% vs 80%, P<0.0001). fFN testing was associated with a cost saving of QAR6,470 (US$1,777) per successful delivery. Conclusion: fFN testing was associated with better short-term clinical outcomes and lower healthcare costs. Nonetheless, due to the retrospective observational nature of the study and differences in baseline characteristics between groups, these results should be interpreted cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.