ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Implementation strategies to promote e-Tracker use in the childhood immunization program in Rwanda - a mixed methods study.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Rwanda, the introduction of a digital immunization registry based in the District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2), the e-Tracker, has encountered several implementation challenges. This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate targeted implementation strategies to enhance the adoption and sustained use of the e-Tracker within the National Immunization Program. Method: We used an implementation research design with a mixed methods approach. We conducted focus group discussions with immunization nurses and co-designed facilitation-based implementation strategies with health workers and implemented them in 12 purposively selected intervention facilities from 48 health facilities that were under-performing on the e-Tracker. The remaining 36 under-performing facilities served as a control group. Evaluations were conducted three months post-implementation with one immunization nurse per facility as respondents, using a process evaluation questionnaire assessing three implementation outcomes: acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. We assessed data consistency for the BCG, Penta3 and MR1 vaccines with routine reports before and after implementation of the co-designed strategies. Results: The co-designed strategies included educational videos, establishment of a collaborative group of immunization health workers to facilitate regular learning, and provision of support from champion users. The intervention group indicated higher acceptability ((Mdn=23 vs. Mdn=20.5, Discussion: The co-designed strategies improved the acceptability and feasibility of the e-Tracker among immunization health workers, while there was no difference in data consistency. These findings suggest an association between participatory, facilitation-based approaches and nurses' commitment which in turn may support sustainable use of digital tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.