Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597521›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Implementation strategies to promote e-Tracker use in the childhood immunization program in Rwanda - a mixed methods study.

Thaoussi Uwera, Ingvild Fossgard Sandøy, J Frederik Frøen, Eleni Papadopoulou, Hassan Sibomana, Andrew Muhire, David K Tumusiime, Mahima Venkateswaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thaoussi UweraCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ingvild Fossgard SandøyCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
J Frederik FrøenGlobal Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Eleni PapadopoulouGlobal Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Hassan SibomanaMaternal, Child and Community Health Division (MCCH), Vaccination programs Unit, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Andrew MuhireDigitalization Directorate General, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
David K TumusiimeRegional Center of Excellence in Biomedical Engineering and e-Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Mahima VenkateswaranGlobal Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In Rwanda, the introduction of a digital immunization registry based in the District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2), the e-Tracker, has encountered several implementation challenges. This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate targeted implementation strategies to enhance the adoption and sustained use of the e-Tracker within the National Immunization Program. Method: We used an implementation research design with a mixed methods approach. We conducted focus group discussions with immunization nurses and co-designed facilitation-based implementation strategies with health workers and implemented them in 12 purposively selected intervention facilities from 48 health facilities that were under-performing on the e-Tracker. The remaining 36 under-performing facilities served as a control group. Evaluations were conducted three months post-implementation with one immunization nurse per facility as respondents, using a process evaluation questionnaire assessing three implementation outcomes: acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. We assessed data consistency for the BCG, Penta3 and MR1 vaccines with routine reports before and after implementation of the co-designed strategies. Results: The co-designed strategies included educational videos, establishment of a collaborative group of immunization health workers to facilitate regular learning, and provision of support from champion users. The intervention group indicated higher acceptability ((Mdn=23 vs. Mdn=20.5, Discussion: The co-designed strategies improved the acceptability and feasibility of the e-Tracker among immunization health workers, while there was no difference in data consistency. These findings suggest an association between participatory, facilitation-based approaches and nurses' commitment which in turn may support sustainable use of digital tools.

Indexed as

e-Registrye-Trackerfacilitation strategyimmunization registryimplementation strategy

Identifiers

PMID42597521
PMCPMC13468503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.