ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2026
Integrating in silico modeling and experimental validation to determine the anti-breast cancer mechanisms of mulberry leaf bioactive compounds.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BRCA) is the most prevalent malignancy and leading cause of cancer-related death in women. To elucidate the anti-BRCA mechanisms of mulberry leaves (ML), the present study used an integrated strategy combining network pharmacology, molecular docking and in vitro validation. The active components of ML, their putative targets and BRCA-related proteins were screened from public databases (Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform, and Encyclopedia of Traditional Chinese Medicine). A protein-protein interaction network was constructed using Cytoscape, followed by Gene Ontology (GO) biological function and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genes (KEGG) pathway analyses through the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery. Molecular docking was then conducted to assess the binding affinities of key compounds to prioritized targets. In vitro assays (MTT, wound healing and flow cytometry) were performed to evaluate the effects of ML on MDA-MB-231 cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis and cell cycle progression. Western blotting was conducted to validate core target proteins. In total, nine bioactive ML compounds (such as quercetin and stigmasterol) were identified, targeting six core proteins [tumor protein p53, estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), catenin β1, AKT serine/threonine kinase 1, MYC proto-oncogene/BHLH transcription factor and telomerase reverse transcriptase]. GO analysis revealed enrichment in 'nucleoplasm', 'enzyme binding' and 'cellular response to hypoxia' terms, whilst KEGG pathway analysis results highlighted 'cancer-related pathways' (such as PI3K/AKT). Stigmasterol exhibited the strongest binding affinity to ESR1 (in silico). In vitro, ML extract significantly suppressed MDA-MB-231 proliferation and migration, induced apoptosis and triggered G
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.