Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597452›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026

Dual Fixation in Complex Long Bone Fractures: A Case Series of 30 Patients.

Muqtadeer Ansari, Priyank Sundriyal, Onkar Dhage, Mohammad Amjad Soheil, Saurabh Damkondwar, Rahul Rathod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muqtadeer AnsariDepartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India.
Priyank SundriyalDepartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India.
Onkar DhageDepartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India.
Mohammad Amjad SoheilDepartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India.
Saurabh DamkondwarDepartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India.
Rahul RathodDepartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Complex long bone fractures characterized by comminution, segmental patterns, metaphyseal extension, or associated joint instability pose significant challenges to stable fixation. While intramedullary nailing remains the standard treatment for diaphyseal fractures, certain fracture configurations are prone to mechanical failure, delayed union, or non-union when treated with a single fixation modality. Dual fixation using a combination of intramedullary nailing and plate augmentation may provide superior biomechanical stability and improve healing outcomes. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of primary dual fixation in complex long bone fractures and to assess its role as a proactive strategy for preventing fixation failure and non-union. Materials and Methods: A prospective case series was conducted at a tertiary care center over a 24-month period. Thirty adult patients (24 males, 6 females; mean age 36.9 years) with complex long bone fractures were treated using primary dual fixation consisting of a non-locking intramedullary nail supplemented with plate augmentation. Fracture locations included the femur (n = 14), humerus (n = 14), and ulna (n = 2). Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Outcome measures included radiological union, functional scores using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), time to mobilization, and complications. Results: Union was achieved in all 30 patients (100%). Mean time to radiological union was 16.5 weeks (range 13-22 weeks). Delayed union occurred in 3 patients (10%) but resolved without additional intervention by 24 weeks. No cases of non-union or construct failure were observed. Mean DASH score for upper-limb fractures was 12.8, while the mean LEFS score for lower-limb fractures was 75.6. Excellent-to-good functional outcomes were achieved in 26 patients (86.7%). Partial weight-bearing commenced at a mean of 4.5 weeks, and full weight-bearing was achieved at a mean of 10.8 weeks in lower-limb fractures. Complications included superficial infection in 2 patients (6.7%), implant irritation in 3 patients (10%), and migration of a titanium elastic nail in 2 patients (6.7%). No deep infections occurred. Conclusion: Primary dual fixation provides reliable union, excellent functional outcomes, and a low complication rate in complex long bone fractures. By combining the load-sharing advantages of intramedullary nailing with the rotational and axial stability of plate augmentation, this strategy may prevent the delayed union, non-union, and fixation failures traditionally associated with mechanically unstable fracture patterns. These findings support consideration of dual fixation as a definitive primary treatment option in selected complex fractures and warrant further evaluation through prospective comparative studies.

Indexed as

complex long bone fracturesDual fixationfracture unionintramedullary nailingnail-plate constructorthopedic traumaplate augmentation

Identifiers

PMID42597452
PMCPMC13469420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.