ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
A comparative analysis of pretrained Wav2Vec XLSR-53 and Whisper-Small models for automatic speech recognition in the Telugu language.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents the development of an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system tailored for Telugu, one of the widely spoken Indian languages. In recent years, deep learning (DL) techniques have been applied to develop ASR systems across various languages and domains. These models, however, require substantial training resources and extensive corpora of continuous speech composed from multiple dialectal speakers, along with their corresponding transcripts. This paper investigates the effectiveness of pre-trained models like Wav2Vec XLSR-53 and Whisper-Small for developing ASR systems for the Telugu language, addressing the challenge of limited data availability and demonstrating satisfactory results even when fine-tuned on a smaller dataset. We utilized approximately 20 h of speech data comprising 17,421 sentences of the Telugu language. The models are fine-tuned on four publicly available datasets, including OpenSLR, Common Voice, IndicVoices, and IndicTTS, to introduce greater diversity in both speaker demographics and linguistic content. The Wav2Vec XLSR-53 model achieved a word error rate (WER) of 27.3% and a character error rate (CER) of 6.8% on the test dataset, whereas the Whisper-Small attained a WER of 28.67% and a CER of 7.55%. In addition, performance of the models was evaluated by introducing noise to both individual datasets as well as a combined noise dataset. The results show that, on the combined noise dataset, Wav2Vec XLSR-53 achieved a WER of 19.59% and a CER of 4.58%, while Whisper Small obtained a lower WER of 13.97% and a CER of 3.54%. These results underscore the usefulness of leveraging pre-trained architectures in low-resource linguistic scenarios such as Telugu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.