Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597434›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in neurology2026

Clinical correlates, procedural benchmarks, and reperfusion-outcome dissociation after mechanical thrombectomy for acute large-vessel occlusion stroke: a single-center retrospective registry study.

Hao Xu, Zhouming Ren, Xinzheng Fu, Xuyan Zhang

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao XuDepartment of Neurology, Haining People's Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.
Zhouming RenDepartment of Neurology, Haining People's Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.
Xinzheng FuDepartment of Neurology, Haining People's Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.
Xuyan ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Haining People's Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is an established treatment for selected patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion (LVO). Single-center registries remain useful for reviewing outcomes, safety events, and workflow in routine care provided that their analytic limits are clearly stated. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a single-center mechanical thrombectomy registry covering January 2023 to December 2025. The final cohort included 212 patients; 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) data were available in 206 (97.2%). The primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days (mRS 0-2). Procedural and safety outcomes were summarized for the full cohort. Two pre-specified logistic regression models were used to explore clinical and procedural correlates and were interpreted with explicit caution regarding sample size and events-per-variable limitations. Robustness was assessed using (i) Firth penalized maximum-likelihood estimation, (ii) an anterior-circulation-only sensitivity Model 1, (iii) E-value computation and inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting for the intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) association, (iv) four-scenario handling of missing 90-day mRS including multiple imputation by chained equations, (v) optimism-corrected area under the curve (AUC) with 2,000-iteration bootstrap, and (vi) a Results: Among patients with available 90-day follow-up, 111 of 206 (53.9%) achieved functional independence; across alternative handling of the 6 patients with missing follow-up, the proportion ranged from 52.4% (worst-case) to 55.2% (best-case), with multiple imputation yielding 53.3%. Baseline NIHSS score showed the most consistent adjusted association with lower odds of functional independence [Model 1: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99; Firth aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99]. Intravenous thrombolysis before thrombectomy showed a numerical adjusted association with functional independence (Model 1 aOR 2.14, 95% CI 1.11-4.13; Firth aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.09-3.91). This magnitude is much larger than randomized-trial pooled estimates (relative risk approximately 1.05-1.15) and is best explained by confounding by indication. The E-value of 2.10 for the point estimate (1.29 for the lower confidence bound) indicates that a moderately strong unmeasured confounder could explain the observed association. In an anterior-circulation-only sensitivity analysis ( Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective registry, baseline stroke severity was the most consistent clinical correlate of 90-day functional independence after mechanical thrombectomy, holding up across Firth-penalized, anterior-circulation-only, and collateral-adjusted sensitivity analyses. The IVT association lost statistical significance under overlap weighting (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 0.58-6.09), which we read as confounded rather than causal and which brings the present registry in line with the small randomized-trial effect size. Procedural success was exceptionally high yet decoupled from functional recovery in nearly half of patients. The data are best viewed as a local EVT benchmark and as a basis for quality review, including continued attention to door-to-EVT workflow and to mechanisms of futile reperfusion.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeOutcome Assessment, Health CareRegistriesReperfusionStrokeThrombectomyAgedAged, 80 and overBenchmarkingFemaleHumansMaleMechanical ThrombolysisMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesfunctional independencelarge-vessel occlusionlogistic regressionmechanical thrombectomymodified Rankin Scaleretrospective registry

Identifiers

PMID42597434
PMCPMC13467987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.