Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597419›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Creating an interdisciplinary, modular, and policy-oriented county-level mental health index for the United States.

Jared Datzman, Gabriel Allen-Moi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jared DatzmanDepartment of Public Health, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA, United States.
Gabriel Allen-MoiDepartment of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the United States, there is an increased focus on mental health problems and the need for effective estimates of localization of mental health problems is manifest. This study draws on behavioral, economic, social, and public health risk factors to predict county-level mental health for counties in the United States. Methods: Candidate predictors were identified from a literature review. Selected variables were condensed into relevant submodules and a mental health outcomes index using separate principal component analyses. The submodules were then regressed to predict the mental health index. County-level vulnerability scores were calculated for each predictor to assess their relative importance as suggested by the model. Findings: A systematic search of available data yielded a set of 56 predictive factors, including novel predictors. Seventeen submodules in five policy domains were derived, explaining 85.1% of the mental health index variance. Tableau was utilized to create interactive maps displaying the submodules and mental health outcomes over counties in the United States for use by policymakers and stakeholders. Interpretation: This model may be used for several purposes throughout the government and academia, the timeliest of which would be providing information to redirect mental health interventions to maximize outcomes as funders begin pursuing efficiency of spending over volume spent. By utilizing the index and submodules, policymakers can focus their mental health improvement efforts in the most impactful areas for their constituencies.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMental DisordersMental HealthHumansUnited StatesGIS—geographic information systemmental health indexmental health surveillanceprincipal component analysis—PCApublic mental health (PMH)

Identifiers

PMID42597419
PMCPMC13467919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.