Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597395›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Profile analysis of college students' AI literacy and cognitive flexibility and its correlation with deep learning ability.

Li Simo, Su Lina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Li SimoDepartment of Humanities, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot, China.
Su LinaDepartment of Humanities, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: AI literacy and cognitive flexibility are essential core capabilities for college students in the age of intelligent technologies. Nevertheless, the heterogeneous group characteristics of college students in these two competencies, as well as their connections with deep learning, have not been sufficiently investigated. This study aimed to classify college students into distinct subgroups according to their levels of AI literacy and cognitive flexibility, explore relevant influencing factors of subgroup categorization, and further clarify differences in deep learning performance across different subgroups. Methods: A cross-sectional research design was adopted. A total of 591 college students recruited from two universities in mainland China participated in this questionnaire survey. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to categorize participants based on AI literacy and cognitive flexibility levels. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to analyze demographic and behavioral factors correlated with subgroup belonging. The Bolck-Croon-Hagenaars (BCH) approach was utilized to compare deep learning scores among all identified profiles. Results: Three distinct latent profiles were extracted: the Dually Constrained group (30.5%), the Latent Potential group (31.3%), and the Comprehensively Integrated group (38.2%). Urban residential background, natural science major enrollment, satisfactory academic performance, and frequent AI application were positive predictors of membership in the Comprehensively Integrated profile. In contrast, rural residency, humanities majors, poor academic achievement, and infrequent AI use were significantly correlated with classification into the Dually Constrained group. Statistically significant upward trends in deep learning scores were observed from the Dually Constrained group to the Comprehensively Integrated group. Discussion: Obvious heterogeneity exists among college students regarding AI literacy and cognitive flexibility. Students with insufficient AI exposure and unsatisfactory academic performance are more likely to fall into the disadvantaged Dually Constrained subgroup. Targeted educational interventions are required for vulnerable student groups to lift their AI literacy, cognitive flexibility and deep learning outcomes. Notably, given the cross-sectional nature of this research, all detected relationships are correlational rather than causal; causal inference cannot be drawn.

Indexed as

AI literacycognitive flexibilitycollege studentsdeep learninglatent profile analysis

Identifiers

PMID42597395
PMCPMC13467831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.