Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597362›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026

Advancements in research on feeding intolerance to enteral nutrition in neurocritical patients undergoing sedation and analgesia.

Na Lu, Zhao Qi Du, Xue Chang Cai, Shui Hua Jin, Yue Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Na LuDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Qingdao Huangdao District Central Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Zhao Qi DuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Qingdao Huangdao District Central Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Xue Chang CaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Qingdao Huangdao District Central Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Shui Hua JinDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Qingdao Huangdao District Central Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Yue ZhangDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Qingdao Huangdao District Central Hospital, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Neurocritical Care Unit (NICU), deep sedation and analgesia are essential for managing critically ill patients to control intracranial pressure and reduce brain stress. However, these drugs-particularly opioids and benzodiazepines-significantly impair gastrointestinal motility and barrier function, increasing the risk of feeding intolerance (FI) to 46.38-62.0% in this population (1). FI manifests as elevated gastric residual volume, abdominal distension, vomiting, or failure to meet enteral nutrition targets within 72 h (2), and is associated with higher infection rates, prolonged hospital stay, increased medical costs, and worse neurological and overall prognosis (3). Therefore, clarifying the pathophysiological mechanisms, risk factors, assessment methods, and management strategies of FI in the context of sedation and analgesia is vital for developing standardized, individualized nutritional support plans for neurocritical patients. This review systematically elaborates the "neuro-sedation-gut" triad mechanism, stratifies population-specific risk factors graded by the GRADE system, integrates precise multimodal assessment tools, and proposes an algorithmic management pathway aligned with 2023-2024 ESPEN/ASPEN guidelines, to provide targeted theoretical and practical references for neurocritical care practice.

Indexed as

dietary fiberenteral nutritionfeeding intoleranceintra-abdominal pressureneurocritical carereviewsedation and analgesia

Identifiers

PMID42597362
PMCPMC13467814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.