Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597337›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026

Case Report: Single-access epidural adhesiolysis and catheter-delivered pulsed radiofrequency for refractory failed back surgery syndrome.

Rafael Nascimento

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rafael NascimentoFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) frequently involves mixed mechanical, inflammatory, and neuropathic mechanisms and remains challenging to treat, particularly when systemic anti-inflammatory therapy is limited. We report a 55-year-old woman with chronic refractory left lumbosciatica after endoscopic lumbar discectomy and L3-L4 arthrodesis, with established coronary artery disease and prior myocardial infarction limiting the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated prior L3-L4 arthrodesis, multilevel degenerative disc disease, and an L4-L5 diffuse disc protrusion causing dural-sac compression, degenerative central canal narrowing, and bilateral foraminal narrowing; lower-limb electroneuromyography did not show active large-fiber radiculopathy. A single-session, single-access caudal procedure was performed using a radiopaque steerable epidural catheter-electrode system, allowing both catheter-directed adhesiolysis and sequential epidural pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) delivery through the catheter tip adjacent to the left S1, L5, L4, and L3 dorsal root ganglion/nerve-root regions. At 5 days, the patient reported approximately 60% improvement in the radiating lower-limb pain. At 8 weeks, she reported approximately 70% improvement in the radicular pain component, while overall pain intensity decreased from NRS 9/10 to 5/10, with residual axial low back pain. A transient sacral neuritis with gluteal paresthesia was the only adverse event and resolved with conservative treatment. This case illustrates a combined interventional strategy for selected patients with refractory FBSS, while the single-case, multicomponent design precludes attribution of benefit to any individual element.

Indexed as

dorsal root ganglionepidural adhesiolysisepidural catheterfailed back surgery syndromepulsed radiofrequency

Identifiers

PMID42597337
PMCPMC13469078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.